Technology in elderly care works best when it is invisible and when it never demands anything of the person it is helping. A sensor that notices the kettle has not been used by eleven in the morning is worth more than any app that requires someone to press a button.
These articles cover passive monitoring that respects dignity and privacy, alerting a family member without alarming the resident, and the difference between reassurance and surveillance — a line worth drawing deliberately.
Articles in this category
-
Setting up a smart home for a parent who does not want technology
Why restraint beats hardware, which devices are genuinely invisible, and how to lead with the things that improve their day rather than your peace of mind.
-
Consent, dignity and who sees the data
The conversation that has to happen before anything is installed — what monitoring genuinely costs, the five questions to agree, and where this becomes a legal matter rather than a family one.
-
Passive monitoring that respects dignity: what to measure and what to leave alone
The most effective monitoring in a home does not watch anybody. It watches the ordinary traces of daily life, and speaks up only when they stop appearing.
-
Fall detection: what actually works, and what it cannot do
An honest comparison of wearables, radar and bed sensors — and why the cheap lighting change that prevents falls beats every technology that detects them.
-
Medication reminders that people actually follow
Forgetting, uncertainty, complexity and reluctance are four different problems. Buying a reminder for the wrong one is the most common mistake.
-
Night-time safety: the hours when most things go wrong
Dim warm lighting on the bed-to-bathroom route, a bed sensor that notices someone has not returned, and the notification setting that quietly disables everything.
-
Cold homes: the conversation worth having before winter
Cold housing is a health issue rather than a comfort one, and the people most likely to be economising are the ones most at risk.